Validation & Verification Tests
Comparative Analysis Against Reference Software and Validated Datasets
Sigma Exacta is committed to transparency and accuracy in all engineering calculations. This section provides comprehensive validation data comparing our tools against established reference software, industry standards, and validated datasets. Our goal is to ensure that engineers can trust the results provided by Sigma Exacta for critical decision-making.
Validation Methodology
Our Verification Approach
All Sigma Exacta tools undergo rigorous validation using the following methodology:
- Reference Software Comparison: Results are compared against established engineering software
- Published Dataset Verification: Testing against validated datasets from academic and industry sources
- Real-world Scenario Testing: Application to actual engineering problems
All validation tests are documented with complete datasets, methodologies, and results to ensure reproducibility.
Validation Tests Coming Soon
This section is currently under development. We are conducting comprehensive validation tests for the most critical Sigma Exacta tools.
The following validation reports will be published here as they are completed:
Planned Validation Tests
Cpk Calculator Validation
Tolerance Stack-up Analysis
Weibull Analysis Tool
Taguchi DOE Module
FMEA Tool Verification
TRIZ Algorithm Validation
Contact for Validation Contributions
If you would like to contribute validation datasets, report discrepancies, or suggest reference standards:
All contributions will be acknowledged in our documentation. Please contact us via email or LinkedIn to participate.